ASIC Enforcement wrap: April 2022

9 May 2022
Regulation

In a busy April 2022, ASIC announced many enforcement actions, including administrative bannings or disqualifications, hefty civil penalties and compensation orders, and criminal consequences including prison terms.

We analysed these to provide insight into ASIC’s recent activities and areas of focus.

The key takeaways

- Civil Action – 6 companies and 1 individual were subjected to infringement notices, travel restraint orders, fines, compensation and other civil action for misconduct including mis-selling insurance, providing false and misleading documents in loan applications, false statements connected to foreign exchange trading accounts, and misleading statements to super fund members.

Most notably, in a very costly month for Westpac, in 7 separate Federal Court matters ASIC obtained total fines of $114.5 million against the Big Four banking group.

- Administrative Action – 27 individuals and a company were banned, disqualified or had their licences cancelled for a range of misconduct.  This included:

  • illegal “phoenix” activity; 
  • auditors’ lack of independence, fitness and propriety;
  • lacking honesty and integrity;
  • using their position for personal gain; and 
  • involvement in multiple failed companies.

- Criminal Action:

  • 3 individuals and 1 company received criminal penalties, including terms of imprisonment, for dishonesty offences such as fraud.  These actions involved various industries and services, including cryptocurrency-backed loans, resources and mining, and debt management.
  • in addition, 2 individuals received criminal sanctions for making false statements in a form lodged with ASIC to deregister a company and in an annual credit licence compliance certificate.

April’s enforcement activity demonstrates continued ASIC presence across all three areas of civil, administrative and criminal action.  There were significant civil outcomes against Westpac Group entities and the commencement of civil penalty proceedings against Macquarie Bank.  

At the other end of the spectrum, a number of smaller entities and individuals were subject to administrative action, demonstrating the willingness of ASIC to use all enforcement tools at its disposal.  

A notable case was that of Mark Babbage, who made headlines for the wrong reasons when he travelled to Perth to watch Melbourne Football Club break its premiership drought and landed himself in a lot of trouble.  The fallout continues, with ASIC banning him from providing financial services for 10 years based on those events.

Financial penalties, compensation and other civil action

The following 5 companies (or corporate groups) and one individual were subjected to infringement notices, fines, compensation orders and other civil action:

  • In 7 separate matters in the Federal Court, the Westpac banking group was fined $114.5 million for widespread compliance failures across multiple business, including its banking, superannuation, wealth management and insurance brands.  This included:

Bannings, disqualifications and licence cancellations

27 individuals and one company were subject to bannings, disqualifications or licence cancellations:

Criminal consequences for fraud and other dishonesty

The following 3 individuals and a company were criminally charged or penalised for dishonesty offences, including fraud, following ASIC investigations:

Criminal consequences for providing false information to ASIC

ASIC took action against the following 2 individuals for false statements in forms lodged with ASIC:

  • Salam Zaki, former director of Professional Project Services Pty Ltd, was found not guilty of making a false or misleading statement in a form lodged with ASIC to deregister the company.   
  • Shiwei (Darren) He, a former mortgage broker, was sentenced and released without proceeding to conviction after entering into a $5000 recognizance to be of good behaviour for two years.  Mr He had falsely stated in a credit licence annual compliance certificate that none of the “fit and proper” people under his credit licence had had their accreditation suspended or cancelled by a lender. 

Anthony Jensen, Senior Associate

Dan Mackay, Managing Director

The contents of this article do not constitute legal advice and it is not intended to be a substitute for legal advice and should not be relied upon as such.  It is designed and intended as general information in summary form, current at the time of publication, for general informational purposes only.  You should seek legal advice or other professional advice in relation to any particular legal matters you or your organisation may have.